To address the issues of acquiescence and suggestibility, great care must be taken with the questioning styles used in consultations with a client with intellectual disability.

Although all people are vulnerable to suggestion when being interviewed, people with intellectual disability tend to be more susceptible to the negative consequences of poor questioning (Milne & Bull, 2001). Kebbell et al. (2001) state that two categories of questions frequently used by lawyers can cause problems for witnesses with intellectual disability: (1) questions that communicate the answer required (including yes/no questions, either/or questions and repeated questions), and (2) questions that confuse the witness (including questions with a negative or double negative, multiple questions, and questions with complex vocabulary and sentence structure). They state that ‘all of these unhelpful question types are more likely to be asked by hostile lawyers in cross-examination than by friendly lawyers in evidence-in-chief’. (For more information, see the section: ‘Questioning’.)

Understanding legal terms

Ericson and Perlman (2001) examined the knowledge and understanding of legal terminology used commonly in court proceedings amongst adults with developmental disabilities. They asked the participants to identify which terms they were familiar with and then asked participants to give detail about what they thought the words meant. They found that 75 percent or more of participants with developmental disabilities understood the terms: Court, Jail, Judge, Lawyer, Lie, Police Officer, Truth, Witness.

However, the following terms were not understood by at least 40 percent of participants: Accused, Adjourn, Allegation, Arrest, Case, Charges, Convict, Court Reporter, Crown, Attorney, Defendant, Detective, Evidence, Guilty, Hearing, Interrogate, Objection, Prosecute, Suspect, Swear an Oath, Testimony, Trial, Victim.

The study also found that reporting familiarity with a word was not a reliable indicator of actual familiarity with a word. This is important, because it shows that simply asking ‘do you understand?’ is not a sufficient way of determining a client’s actual level of understanding. It is important to ask clients to explain back in their own words what they understand, and then use that response as a basis to clear up any misunderstanding. The fact that some of the participants were able to provide accurate responses suggests that, if given time and support, people with intellectual disability have the potential to develop deeper understanding of the legal processes affecting them.

In general, questions should be kept as simple and concrete as possible. Abstract questions and concepts should not be used. Ideally, interviewers should consider ways that they can change their own behaviour and adapt their questioning formats to suit the communication needs of the interviewee (Brennan & Brennan, 1994).

Important things to remember when interviewing clients with intellectual disability include:

  • Use plain, simple English 
  • Avoid closed questions 
  • Think before repeating questions: repeating questions may encourage the client to change their answer or to acquiesce. The client may assume that their first answer was wrong and that they should change it (Brennan & Brennan, 1994)
  • Keep questions of choice very simple. Either/or questions tend elicit more reliable responses, because giving too many choices will be more likely to produce a ‘last option bias’. This could be caused by the client’s ‘difficulty in remembering the choice of replies’ (Milne & Bull, 2001) 
  • Avoid multiple questions (for example: ‘As you went into the kitchen, he picked up a knife to defend himself against you? Because you have attacked Adrian in the past, have you not?’). Instead, ask each question separately, and give time for a response to each 
  • Avoid double-barrelled questions 
  • Avoid double negatives.

(For further information, see the section: ‘Questioning’.)

An example of how repeated questioning may encourage someone to acquiesce

Lawyer: Do you remember at your house there used to be shovels kept under the house?

Witness: No.

Lawyer: No shovels?

Witness: There weren’t any shovels.

Lawyer: No shovels at all?

Witness: I don’t think so.

Lawyer: Big long shovels, like this?

Witness: Oh maybe there were some shovels?

Lawyer: Metal?

Witness: Yeah.

Adapted from Kebbell, Hatton, Johnson & O’Kelly, 2001.

The Centre for Applied Disability Research (CADR) Disability Knowledge Clearing House has been launched, to help people navigate the new disability market under the NDIS. The Clearing House exists to help people understand 'what works, for whom, under what circumstances, at what cost’. You will...
The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) has officially started in Queensland today, signalling the beginning of a new era in disability services and huge opportunity for new workers to join the sector. The NDIS is the biggest social reform in more than 40 years, giving people with...
Michael Hogan, Director General of the Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services has provided the following overview of his department's budget services for peak and partner organisations. The department's total operating expenditure for 2016-17 is $2.818 billion, representing...
Housing is fundamental for people to enjoy life, take part, learn, love and live with dignity. For far too many people with disability, housing is part of the struggle to be included and to participate in community and family life. People with disability want housing that is well-designed, secure,...
The second video in the What the NDIS means to me series is now available to view online. This video focusses on service providers and what the NDIS means to them. You can watch the new video on YouTube now . The first video sharing the experiences of people in North Queensland getting ready to...
Now in its fifth year, The Salvation Army's Economic and Social Impact Survey (ESIS) surveyed more than 1,600 clients across Australia. The report revealed “disturbing new statistics on the level of poverty in Australia”, showing that some disadvantaged Australians are living on just $17 a day. “...
nib foundation's Community Grant program aims to support locally-based initiatives which will make a positive difference to the health and wellbeing of Australian communities, with a focus on the health of young people, and carers. A Community Grant round is held each year and applications are...
Queensland Health have released My health, Queensland's future: Advancing health 2026 (Advancing health) which sets out a 10 year vision and strategy for the Queensland health system. Advancing health outlines how the health system can better serve patients, their families and their communities and...
The National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) published their Market Position Statement for Queensland this week. The NDIA predict significantly higher growth in jobs than the 13,000 FTE predicted by Qld Government: the NDIA expects between 15,900 and 19,400 extra FTE jobs in Queensland by the...
Queenslanders with disability will benefit from a $2.8 million funding boost and additional support services to help them prepare for the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), which will roll out in Queensland from mid-year. Disability Services Minister Coralee O’Rourke said the additional...


Your search yielded no results

There may not be any content with your search criteria.

  • Check if your spelling is correct.
  • Remove quotes around phrases to search for each word individually. bike shed will often show more results than "bike shed".
  • Consider loosening your query with OR. bike OR shed will often show more results than bike shed.

See videos from StudioQ related to this topic

Share or Print